Bollygyaan Bollywood Forum

[screaming skull]

i think if we compare the autistic portions yes hrithik was more impactful..
but this is what i felt..
i think in hrithiks case there was a higher percentage of contrinbution of his make up,hair and clothes stylist..i mean he was made to look like a school going autistic guy..just 1 look at that person will itself wash away all the images u had abt hrithik..and thats half the battle won..same goes with amitabh in paa(and in this case to a larger extent..even more than hrithik)where as srk didnt have a huge transformation look wise..it is too srks credit that only on the basis of his acting he he made it seem it different..
also kmg was a much much better flick which obvioulsly helps ur performance..the impact of good acting is enhanced if it is supported by a good scene..where as mnik was bland..srk made it watchable..

having said all that abt makeup,clothes,hairstyle i found hrithiks perforamance more touching..nothing to take away from that...but only till the time he was autisitic..im definitely not a fan of his performance in the last half an hour..
so if i have to rate srks performance in mnik with hrithiks entire kmg act i think they both fall in a similar league..what do u guyz think?

[FCB_LM19]

Tough question but I would go for Hrithik in KMG cuz KMG was a better movie than MNIK..so Hrithik's performance made more impact on me...I didn't feel for SRK's character at all..If MNIK was a better movie, then may be I woulda gone for SRK's performance...but because I connected to Hrithik's character more, I will pick his performance..